![]() | ||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||
| Dr.
J. Michael Stitt | ||||||||||||||||
| MALINOWSKI
AND FUNCTIONALISM | ||||||||||||||||
|
FUNCTIONALISM |
| |||||||||||||||
| All earlier theories of myth treated myths as misunderstood by those who told them. To understand the "true" meaning of myth, scholars had to reconstruct the text according to some theoretical perspective. Anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski was more than a theoretician, he actively studied a living mythic tradition among the Trobriand islanders in the South Pacific. He discovered that, far from being useless survivals, myths served a centrally important role in the culture. They were functional. | ||||||||||||||||
|
MYTH AS
CHARTER FOR SOCIETY | | |||||||||||||||
| In
Malinowski's famous formulation, myths are a charter for society. That
is, myths shape and reaffirm a culture's social structures. For example, the complex
social relations among the Greek gods confirms the "rightness" of the
Greeks' complex social structure; conversely, the largely undifferentiated social
structure of the Germanic gods reaffirms the "rightness" of the largely
undifferentiated social structure of the Germanic peoples. Myths are not necessarily a mirror of society. Incest among the Greek gods does not mean the ancient Greeks regularly practiced incest. Instead, it reaffirms the hierarchical relationship between gods and humans -- gods are not constrained by human social relationships. Myths, of course, have other functions than as charters for society. In general, though, myths tend to be conservative, reaffirming the rightness of the status quo. | ||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||