![]() | |||||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||||
| Dr.
J. Michael Stitt | |||||||||||||||
| CULTURAL
EVOLUTION | |||||||||||||||
|
THE INTELLECTUAL
ENVIRONMENT | | ||||||||||||||
| The nineteenth century had been fascinated with theories of evolution for some time before Darwin. His data supporting biological evolution further spurred evolutionary thinking in many areas. Unlike Euhemerism and solar mythology, the theory of cultural evolution was not specifically developed for the study of myth; nonetheless, it had significant impact on nineteenth and early twentieth century mythology. | |||||||||||||||
|
CULTURAL
EVOLUTION | | ||||||||||||||
| The
theory of cultural
evolution held that all cultures go through three stages of development:
savagery, primitivism, and civilization. Cultural evolutionists concluded that the study of "savage" and "primitive" cultures would lead to an understanding of their own cultural past. The discipline of anthropology was born. The problem of ethnocentrism: the theory was developed by educated, upper-class Englishmen; not surprisingly, they perceived their (sub)culture to be the "natural" endpoint of evolution. | |||||||||||||||
|
SIR JAMES
FRAZER | | ||||||||||||||
| Frazer's multi-volume work, The Golden Bough, was a milestone in cultural evolutionary studies. Although mythologists have long recognized some of the weaknesses of his work, he is frequently referred to more or less uncritically by nonspecialists. His work established the standard evolutionary view: savagery is characterized by magic; primitivism, by religion; and, civilization by science. The age of savagery is the mythopoeic age. Also, for Frazer, most if not all myth arises from ritual actions. | |||||||||||||||
|
ANDREW
LANG | | ||||||||||||||
| From the concept of a mythopoeic age of savagery, Lang concluded that myths among primitive cultures such as the ancient Greeks, who practiced religion, were survivals. They now served as "primitive science" and were often etiological in nature. As survivals, they were often garbled and misunderstood; it was up to the modern scholar to reconstruct the "true" meaning of the myth. | |||||||||||||||