Homepage


Syllabus

Glossary

Dr. J. Michael Stitt
phone: 702 895-3909
fax: 702 895-4801
e-mail:
jmstitt@unlv.nevada.edu


Cultural History
CULTURAL EVOLUTION
The Intellectual Environment
Cultural Evolution
Sir James Frazer
Andrew Lang
 
 
THE INTELLECTUAL ENVIRONMENT
The nineteenth century had been fascinated with theories of evolution for some time before Darwin. His data supporting biological evolution further spurred evolutionary thinking in many areas. Unlike Euhemerism and solar mythology, the theory of cultural evolution was not specifically developed for the study of myth; nonetheless, it had significant impact on nineteenth and early twentieth century mythology.
Top | Next | Previous
 
 
CULTURAL EVOLUTION
The theory of cultural evolution held that all cultures go through three stages of development: savagery, primitivism, and civilization.

Cultural evolutionists concluded that the study of "savage" and "primitive" cultures would lead to an understanding of their own cultural past. The discipline of anthropology was born.

The problem of ethnocentrism: the theory was developed by educated, upper-class Englishmen; not surprisingly, they perceived their (sub)culture to be the "natural" endpoint of evolution.

Top | Next | Previous
 
 
SIR JAMES FRAZER

Frazer's multi-volume work, The Golden Bough, was a milestone in cultural evolutionary studies. Although mythologists have long recognized some of the weaknesses of his work, he is frequently referred to more or less uncritically by nonspecialists.

His work established the standard evolutionary view: savagery is characterized by magic; primitivism, by religion; and, civilization by science. The age of savagery is the mythopoeic age. Also, for Frazer, most if not all myth arises from ritual actions.

Top | Next | Previous
 
 
ANDREW LANG

From the concept of a mythopoeic age of savagery, Lang concluded that myths among primitive cultures such as the ancient Greeks, who practiced religion, were survivals. They now served as "primitive science" and were often etiological in nature. As survivals, they were often garbled and misunderstood; it was up to the modern scholar to reconstruct the "true" meaning of the myth.

Top | Next | Previous
Dr. Stitt's Homepage | Syllabus | Next Page | Previous Page