|
Teachers
can use rubrics like these to give students better feedback on their
written work (drafts and final copies). Rubrics give students detailed
feedback while minimizing the time the instructor has to spend writing
comments. For each item, the instructor makes a check mark placing
that student's work on the scale between "weak" and "strong."
Add a few marginal comments and a few end-comments, and the students
will have a clear sense of their strengths and weaknesses.
The
check marks indicate where on a scale of weak-to-strong you are
with particular research and writing skills.
| Research
and Writing Skills |
Weak
|
OK
|
Strong
|
| Content:
substantive, synthetic |
under-examined |
|
depth
and critique
|
| Organization:
clarity, structure |
no
organization |
|
purposeful
flow of ideas
|
| Language:
sentences, wording |
fragments/run-on
sentences |
|
skillful
writing
|
| Mechanics:
spelling, grammar |
errors |
|
no
errors
|
punctuation,
proofing mistakes
|
sloppy
writing |
|
perfect
|
| Research
References: citations |
secondary
sources only |
|
good
mix
|
type
of sources, biblio.
|
poor/no
citation |
|
proper
referencing
|
| Point
of view: voice, analysis |
no
position |
|
developed,
supporter position
|
supported
by evidence
|
unsupported
opinions |
|
careful
opinions
|
| Professional:
style, development |
informal,
chatty |
|
formal,
precise
|
presentation
|
big
words, esoteric jargon |
|
clear
language
|
| Enjoyment:
engagement with |
joyless
presentation |
|
compelling
to read
|
reader,
enthusiasm
|
boring |
|
original,
creative
|
|